1672-8505

CN 51-1675/C

从制度嵌入到认同生成:《民族团结进步促进法》融入高校思想政治教育的理论逻辑与实践进路

From Institutional Embedding to Identity Formation: The Theoretical Logic and Practical Paths of Integrating the Law on Promoting Ethnic Unity and Progress into Ideological and Political Education in Universities

  • 摘要: 《民族团结进步促进法》的顺利通过和颁布实施,标志着我国民族团结进步事业已实现从政策主导迈向法治保障的历史性跨越。高校思想政治教育作为立德树人的主阵地,如何实现这一新型法律规范的有机融入,这是亟待回答的重大理论与现实问题。超越一般“课程添加”式的技术主义思路,“制度嵌入—认同生成”分析框架的提出,有助于从法理基础、心理机制、实践路径等方面系统阐释《民族团结进步促进法》融入高校思想政治教育的内在逻辑。《民族团结进步促进法》与高校思想政治教育的深度融合,本质上应是从外部制度规范向内在价值认同转化的意义建构过程,这一过程应遵循“认知图式更新—情感纽带建构—行为脚本内化”的递进逻辑。依循这一逻辑而提出的“规范化嵌入—体验式转化—制度化沉淀”融入进路,能为高校思想政治教育推进民族团结进步教育提供坚实的学理支撑与明确的实践操作策略。

     

    Abstract: The adoption and implementation of the Law on Promoting Ethnic Unity and Progress of the People's Republic of China marks a historic transition in China's efforts to promote ethnic unity and progress, shifting from policy-based governance to a rule-of-law framework. As the principal institutional setting for fostering students' moral development, university ideological and political education faces the pressing theoretical and practical challenge of effectively integrating this new legal framework into its educational practices. Moving beyond the simplistic approach of merely adding legal content to existing courses, this article develops an analytical framework of "institutional embedding–identity formation" to explain the internal logic of integrating the law into university ideological and political education from the perspectives of legal foundations, psychological mechanisms, and implementation pathways. The study argues that such integration is fundamentally a process of meaning construction through which external institutional norms are transformed into internalized value commitments. This process follows a progressive sequence of renewing cognitive schemas, cultivating emotional bonds, and internalizing behavioral scripts. Building on this logic, the article proposes a three-stage implementation pathway consisting of standardized institutional embedding, experiential transformation, and institutional consolidation. This framework provides both a solid theoretical foundation and practical guidance for promoting education on ethnic unity and progress within university ideological and political education.

     

/

返回文章
返回