1672-8505

CN 51-1675/C

学随势转:论谢无量与近代蜀学的离合

Between Tradition and Modernity: Xie Wuliang and the Transformation of Modern Shu Learning

  • 摘要: 1910年四川存古学堂成立,鼓吹西学且具有革命倾向的谢无量担任学堂监督,彰显出存古与趋新、保守与革命之间的巨大张力。在具体办学实践中,谢无量提出“守楗明通”的主张,即光大蜀中已有之学,全面引进西方学科体系,以构建适应时代需要的新蜀学。过去学界多注重阐释其“守楗”的一面,而相对忽视其“明通”的部分。实际上,“守楗”不过是谢无量对近代蜀学的因势利导,“明通”才是其教育思想中最具价值的部分。谢无量“明通”思想的提出,实为近代学人在四川全面引入西方学科体系的首次尝试,而其以“science”统摄西方学术的观念,对科学思想在近代中国的传播更具有启蒙意义。以谢无量的蜀学思想为参照系,观察其教育理念在具体实践中与蜀中各方势力的依违离合,有利于丰富对近代四川教育史的认识,以及在新与旧、保守与开明的对照中,进一步明晰近代蜀学的时代特征。

     

    Abstract: In 1910, when the Sichuan School for Preserving Ancient Learning was established, Xie Wuliang—an advocate of Western learning with revolutionary leanings—was appointed as its superintendent. His appointment revealed a deep tension between the preservation of classical heritage and the embrace of modernity, as well as between cultural conservatism and revolutionary change. In his educational practice, Xie proposed the principle of shoujian mingtong, which called both for safeguarding the existing scholarly traditions of Shu and for systematically embracing the Western disciplinary system, with the aim of constructing a new form of Shu learning suited to the needs of the times. Previous scholarship has largely focused on the shoujian ("safeguarding the existing scholarly traditions") dimension of his thought while paying comparatively little attention to the mingtong ("embracing modern learning") aspect. In fact, shoujian primarily reflected Xie's strategic response to the circumstances of modern Shu learning, whereas mingtong represented the most innovative element of his educational philosophy. Xie Wuliang's proposal of the "Mingtong" concept marked the first attempt by modern Chinese scholars in Sichuan to comprehensively introduce Western academic disciplines. Moreover, his idea of subsuming Western scholarship under the term "science" held pioneering significance for the dissemination of scientific thought in modern China. By taking Xie Wuliang's ideas on Shu learning as a point of reference and examining how his educational philosophy aligned with or diverged from different intellectual and social forces in Sichuan, this study sheds new light on the history of modern education in the region and highlights the distinctive historical character of modern Shu learning amid the tensions between tradition and innovation.

     

/

返回文章
返回