2095-1124

CN 51-1738/F

从“应用牵引”到“要素驱动”:数实融合的结构性失衡与政策体系优化

From Application-Driven to Factor-Driven: Structural Imbalances in Digital–Real Economies Integration and Policy System Optimization

  • 摘要: 数实融合是培育新质生产力的关键途径,也是“十五五”时期推动经济高质量发展的核心议题。文章基于制度适应性重构理论,以2018—2026年3月国家级和省级617份数实融合政策文本为分析样本,通过对数实融合政策领域与政策工具进行二维分析,剖析数实融合政策演进特征与矛盾。研究发现:产业数字化转型、政策体系保障、生态环境政策构建占比近80%,居于主导地位,而技术创新支持、基础设施建设、数据要素市场化等创新要素政策严重不足;供给型与环境型工具合计超94%,需求型工具仅占5.83%,市场牵引机制明显缺失。当前政策呈现应用导向充足与要素支撑不足共存的特征,在时间上由起步探索到加速推动再至全面爆发,空间上呈东部带头、中西部紧跟其后的格局,呈现“重应用轻基础、重供给轻需求、重分工轻协同”的结构性特征。因此, 需要推动政策从应用牵引向要素驱动、从供给主导向需求响应、从纵向分工向立体协同三个方向转变。据此,文章提出“目标—原则—对象—内容—机制—制度—路径”一体化政策框架,旨在摆脱数实融合困境,优化制度供给,为推动经济高质量发展提供依据与决策参考。

     

    Abstract: The integration of the digital and real economies is a key pathway for fostering new quality productive forces and a central policy priority for advancing high-quality economic development in China's 15th Five-Year Plan period. Drawing on 617 national- and provincial-level policy documents issued between 2018 and March 2026, this study employs a two-dimensional analytical framework of policy domains and policy instruments, grounded in the theory of adaptive institutional reconstruction, to examine the evolution and structural characteristics of digital–real economies integration policies. The findings indicate that policies related to industrial digital transformation, policy support, and ecological and environmental governance account for nearly 80% of the total, whereas support for technological innovation, infrastructure development, and the market-based allocation of data factors remains insufficient. Supply-side and environmental policy instruments together account for more than 94% of all policy measures, while demand-side instruments represent only 5.83%, suggesting a weak market-pull mechanism. Overall, current policies place strong emphasis on application while providing inadequate support for key production factors. Over time, policy development has evolved from initial exploration to accelerated implementation and ultimately to large-scale expansion. Spatially, an eastern region-led pattern has emerged, with central and western regions following closely behind. Existing policies continue to prioritize application over foundational capabilities, supply over demand, and specialization over coordination. Accordingly, policy priorities should shift from application-driven to factor-driven development, from supply-led intervention to demand-responsive governance, and from vertical specialization to integrated coordination. Based on these findings, this study proposes an integrated policy framework encompassing objectives, principles, targets, content, mechanisms, institutions, and implementation pathways, with the aim of strengthening institutional support for digital–real economies integration and providing policy guidance for high-quality economic development.

     

/

返回文章
返回